Guest Writer: John Owed, ITW Ransburg
 
The object of this paper is to identify and discuss  the parameters related to the application equipment,  define their relative purpose and discuss methods for  controlling, optimizing and/or monitoring them.  Once  identified, the “normal” operating parameters used for  day to day operations of a finishing system can serve  as a barometer of the system performance.  When  given parameter changes, effort should be taken to  immediately identify why it changed. 
Atomization Air \ Pattern Air: Atomization Air is the  air pressure used to break up a fluid stream into small  particles.  The atomization air holes on the air cap  are holes drilled in the face of the air cap surrounding  the center where the fluid exists. 
Pattern (also  referred as Horn or Fan) Air is used to shape the  atomized particles into a elliptical shape.  This  elliptical shape is often referred to as the spray  pattern.  The pattern air exits through the raised  portion (horn) or the air cap. 
These terms are  generically associated with all types of spray  applicators including, manual, automatic,  electrostatic, conventional, HVLP and LVMP.  The most common mistake made with these types of  applicators is the failure to obtain a uniform elliptical  spray pattern.  All too often the applicator is  adjusted by ear or feel.  The operator turns up the  air pressure until they can’t hear the supervisor or  until the gun kicks when the trigger is pulled. 
In the  case of a manual application a poorly shaped spray  pattern is compensated for by the operator.  The  operator will make adjustments in their technique  based on the visual feed back they receive while  spraying. 
 With a machine or robot mounted  applicator, it is imperative that a uniform spray  pattern always be maintained.  Since the machine or  robot program is made based on a specific spray  pattern size and index, a misshapen spray pattern  will cause rejects.  In effort to obtain optimal results with an air  atomized applicator, the atomization air and pattern  air must be able to be adjusted independently. 
Testing has proven that in most cases the pattern  air pressure should be 5 to 10 psi higher than the  atomization air pressure.  The following procedure  should be used to obtain an optimal spray pattern: 
1. Adjust the fluid flow rate to the volume  required to obtain the desired coating thickness.   This volume can be calculated based on the surface  area, volume solids, desired coating thickness, and  approximate transfer efficiency.  In the case of an  existing system, start at the rate that is presently  being used. 
2. Adjust atomization air pressure to the  lowest level at which acceptable atomization is  obtained.  Atomization quality can be visually  evaluated by passing a metal test panel through the  atomized particles at the proper target distances.   Start at 15 psi of air pressure and adjusted in  increments of 5 psi.  Label the panels and visually  compare the size of the atomized particles.  Poor  atomization is indicatd by large droplets nestled close  together.  Over atomization will yield very small dry  looking particles.  With good atomization the particles  will have a wet appearance that are some what  uniform in size throughout. 
3. Adjust the pattern air by starting at the air  pressure setting used for the atomization.  Using a  sturdy panel (that won’t move) located at the proper  target distance (10-14 inches), spray the applicator  for several seconds or long enough so that the  pattern will sag.  The air cap should be positioned so  that the pattern is horizontal. 
 Because several spray  outs are typically required, it is best to cover the  panel with pieces of foil that can easily be removed  and compared.  Examine the spray pattern; look for  the paint to sag uniformly along the length.  Adjust  the pattern air pressure up or down as required in 5- psi increments until a cigar shaped pattern with  tapered or blunt edges is obtained.  If the spray  pattern has the appearance of a “dog Bone”, heavy  on the ends and light in the middle, then the pattern  air is too high. If the pattern looks like a “football”  heavy in the center and light on the ends, then the  pattern air is not adjusted high enough.  If a teardrop shaped pattern is obtained (heavy on  one side only), the air cap should be rotated 180  degrees.  If the heavy end switches sides, then  there is a good change that some of the air holes in  the cap are plugged or damaged.  Clean the cap and  repeat the test. 
 If the heavy end does not move  when the air cap is rotated, the fluid tip may be  damaged.  Inspect the air cap and fluid tip  alignment.  The fluid tip and air cap should be  concentric.  If the fluid tip is damaged and touches  the air cap, this can block air flow and cause the  abnormality.  Once a uniform pattern is obtained, the  length of it should be measured and documented. 
Although the above procedure appears to look long  and drawn out on paper, the actual process can be  accomplished in several minutes.  To eliminate the  need for repeating the above procedure on multiple  applicators, test air caps are available.  The test cap  consists of an air cap fitted with hoses and gauges.   They allow the operator to check the air pressure  settings directly at the applicator.  Once the above  settings are documented on the first applicator, the  others can be quickly adjusted by using the test  cap.  The operator should not depend solely on the  reading of a gauge at a pneumatic panel.  In effort  to ensure that all the spray patterns will be the  same, the air pressure at the applicators must be  checked.  The fluid flow rate at each applicator  should also be adjusted so that they are all equal. 
If  the above procedure is followed, all applicators will  have consistent spray patterns. 
 Air atomized electrostatic guns are typically mounted  on a long stroke reciprocator.  A long stroke  reciprocator is generally classified as having a stroke  of three feet or greater.  When adjusting the cycle  rate of a long stroke reciprocator the pattern width  and conveyor speed must be taken into  consideration.  There are several overlaps that will  produce a uniform film.  The two most common and  easily calculated are a 50 and 75% overlap.  With a  50% overlap, the conveyor advances one pattern  width per cycle of the machine (a cycle is made up  of two strokes).  In effort to calculate a 50%  overlap, divide the conveyor speed in inches per  minute by the pattern width in inches (the pattern  width should be measured using the method outline  above).  The answer will be the number of cycles per  minute the machine should run.  Divide this number  into 60 to obtain seconds per cycle and adjust the  machine with a stopwatch.  The maximum speed of  the machine should not exceed 240 feet per minute.   At speed over this, the pattern of the guns  will “broom” and the atomized particles will be  redirected.  This speed should be checked by  multiplying the cycles per minute by the total length  of chain in the machine. 
Please note the following  example:  Example:   Calculating a 50% Overlap,  assume the following   Conveyor Speed: 15 feet   x 12 in. = 180 in.      Min.    1 ft.   Min.    Pattern Width:        14 in.   Machine Data:   Sprocket Centers =  6 ft.      Chain  Length  =  12 ft.  Calculating Cycles per Minute:  Conveyor Speed in/min = Cycles per  minute (cpm)         Pattern Width  180 in/min = 12.86 cyc/min 14 in/cycle  Calculating chain speed:  Cycles per minute x chain length in feet =  Chain Speed  12.86  cyc x  14 ft. = 180 ft.  min. cyc  min.  In the above example, the machine speed was  calculated at 180 feet per minute.  This is an  acceptable speed well within the range of an  efficient application based on a 50% overlap.  With a 75 overlap, the conveyor advances half of the  pattern width per cycle.  A 75% overlap is obtainable  with regards to machine speed is considered more  desirable. A 75% overlap can be easily calculated by  doubling the numbers calculated in the above  example.  In the above example the machine speed  of 180 ft/min @ a 50% overlap would become 360  ft/min. @ a 75% overlap.  This number far exceeds  the recommended maximum of 24 ft/min.  In this  example, a 75% overlap could not be used. 
When the multiple applicators are used on a long  stroke reciprocator which is typically the case, this in  no way impacts the above calculations.  Each  applicator should be visualized putting down a  uniform coat of material based on the overlap  selected.  The spacing of the applicators on the  traveling gun bar should be such that the patterns  do not interfere with each other.  If 14 inch spray  patterns are used, the applicators should be spaced  a minimum of 16 inches apart.                     

 
 
 
 Posts
Posts
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment